Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tdylan's commentslogin

Research != Business idea


This isn't about surpressing free speech. It's about basic communication and debate.


Sarcasm used to be a effective and totally valid way to make a point, -I mean it was even part of basic reading/writing education when I grew up 20 years ago.

Of course you can easily overdo it but I think banning sarcasm has a significant downside and we should rather teach people to use it correctly.


Once again, this isn't about banning anything. This is about productive conversation. A value which makes HN unique out of all the internet communities.

What the commenter was doing was insinuating a conclusion based upon a straw man, so as not to be scrutinised for the underlying conclusion.


Didn't downvote (ok, even gave you an upvote while commenting) but I think you misinterpreted the situation I/we reacted to.


YC has little (to nothing) to gain by selling HN info, but everything to lose.


This isn't Reddit. Make a succinct point, not a straw man.


That word doesn't mean what you think it means.


This was right around the time Uber realised what their UberX could be, after seeing Lyft's system be left alone.


I thought that was Marissa at Yahoo?


It was Marissa at Google. 30 Yahoo! logos in 30 days was Marissa at Yahoo!.


As much as a fan of Gates I am, not a sustainable/efficient system when power is fairly centralised and can be bought.


That's the entire premise. It's econ101.


How is Amy a horrible person?


Her email and tweet kind of speak for themselves, don't they?


Rude/abrupt, yes. But 'horrible' through an email and a tweet seems like a stretch to me.


You can't go to sleep in an RV and wake up at a predefined destination.


So... you're talking about self-driving RV's right?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: