I think is a dumb idea. Historically has been easy to learn programming languages because everyone uses the same things, no fragmention. If now everyone starts creating their own programming languages with different language everything is fragmented, you would to a company, and in the interview they will require you to know korean to work there, they will not be able to hire contractors, you will not be able to see an article about a nice feature on another programming language, and port it...
I suppose is again why I discuss with everyone as I would like to have a single language in the world, it would reduce wars, miscommunications, bound everyone closer. But ofc, the other point of view is that it reduces culture But I think it would happen as UK/US or Spanish, same language with variations, but everyone can understand each other.
I can't imagine what would have happened if Python or JS had been fragmented into X different languages because of egos, and instead of collaborating, decide each to create their own languages. I don't think we would be where we are today, probably AIs would not be around, since we would be fighting to understand so many different programming languages.
The author made some art and came here to share it and discuss craftsmanship, and you replied it with an insult and reviewed it like it’s a business decision steeped in global politics. You missed the point and were mean while doing so.
definitely going to try it with some friends. But it's true that at first I was checking which games I could connect to, or how it worked without reading anything, and thought it was to connect to some multiplayer games of steam, and gaming couch acted as a layer to use phones as joystick only.
Ah right, I see what you mean. For that specific purpose I remember seeing some other software like Virtual Gamepad and Remote Gamepad that should let you use your phone as controller for Steam games. Haven't tested those out myself though
From my POV is not fixing, is another way of work. I don't like what Marimo does, because for that I have scripts.
If I'm loading files from S3, I'm being charge for it. If Marimo re-executes this cell to maintain the state, it will charge me double. I don't need that. I'm able to organize my code, and know how it is being run.
I use mostly the script workflow, but for exploration Marimo is more convenient. It got also to-disk memoization recently. Kinda best of both worlds for exploration (although I'm not a huge fan of editing code in browser). In comparison to the JupyterLab hidden state spaghetti it's a fix.
With proper structuring of the blocks, Marimo will not re-execute the cell. Also memoization in script based workflows is still somewhat clunky on Python even with something like Snakemake.
I do find Marimo's approach, "global" variables tracked between blocks, less than ideal, but it's the best out there.
On my book, "better" being SaaS, not open source or letting your users download it is not a better option. Is merely another Deepnote, Google Colab... but not Jupyter Notebook
Our goal is not to replace Jupyter Notebook, it's a software that does what it claims to do in an excellent way. We are big fans of it.
Our goal is to provide a platform to deploy and scale your notebooks and turn them into data applications that solve the real problems that occur in production environments, like access control, collaboration, version control, and many other things that are required to turn a notebook you're running in your computer into a product.
I had to access the solution for std because I missed the right position of 2, I put it after the parenthesis. And in Fnorm I had to check it in the comments because I didn't thought of the similarity with the m.prod() and the list.
Is a cool experiment, and it could be good to lose the fear in papers. Maybe you could add some exercises with formulas or different papers that are a must read.
Probably this one? https://roadmap.sh/ I have seen it few times last year, so could be. Although I would say it lacks the part of 'practising algorithms'.
Because is mainly using Jupyter Notebook, Python and Pandas.
In this times is normal for companies to create their own products using open source products, but to some people is not very good seen.
In my case I think is not worth it a tool that only works in some specific environment, that doesn't have many functionalities, and it costs more than all the products of Jetbrains. I don't like either that is a tool built on top of open sources projects trying to charge a big amount while it does not have almost any functionality.
> Because is mainly using Jupyter Notebook, Python and Pandas.
I really don't think that is correct. It integrates into those / builds on them, but those projects absolutely do not have the features that I can see playing around with this product.
I suppose is again why I discuss with everyone as I would like to have a single language in the world, it would reduce wars, miscommunications, bound everyone closer. But ofc, the other point of view is that it reduces culture But I think it would happen as UK/US or Spanish, same language with variations, but everyone can understand each other.
I can't imagine what would have happened if Python or JS had been fragmented into X different languages because of egos, and instead of collaborating, decide each to create their own languages. I don't think we would be where we are today, probably AIs would not be around, since we would be fighting to understand so many different programming languages.