Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | scalyweb's commentslogin

As entrepreneurs at what point do you decide that Amazon is "too big" and do you decide to stick with smaller service providers? Is your use of Amazon strictly a commodity provider?


What do you mean by "too big"? I guess what I'm wondering is what about that would motivate switching to smaller providers.


This probably deserves a separate discussion.

As an entrepreneur do you also use other entrepreneur's/start-up's services or just rely on the big (market share) players in the market? A startup is hard so do you go out of your way to help support other smaller service providers?

If you have an opportunity to support competition in the marketplace by not flocking to the lowest price(Walmart) but paying a bit more for a smaller service, do you make that sacrifice?

Knowing that NearlyFreeSpeech.Net appears to offer similar functionality, why choose a larger provider like Amazon if you have the mindset of a founder?


No part of the mindset of a founder requires you to select inferior alternatives out of empathy for the people who provide them.


Nah, the only reason to go with a startup is if it's better than the big guys, or you need personalized service, or you think they'll move much faster than the big guys, and it would block you otherwise.

If they're not much, much better than the incumbents they're competing with, they're going to go out of business, leaving you with a broken dependency.


Better customer service. Small companies usually make it possible to get to speak to a real (and knowledgeable) person quickly in case of a problem. They really value their customers because they have a problem when they leave.

Try doing that with juggernauts such as Google or Amazon.


When their service becomes unacceptable. It has nothing to do do with "bigness." We all use Google, after all.


Except when we use DuckDuckGo.


This is the product from someone with a doctorate in neuroscience? So much for moving the human collective forward. Now I don't feel so bad about the kids coming out with undergraduate CS degrees feeling like they don't know how to program.

I don't use Facebook but I do use Twitter. I do love games. What is it in regards to social networks, games and the idea of positive reinforcement am I missing with this project?


Well, it is cloying and silly. But it has something many, many games do not: actual feedback. So many have none at all, or unrelated to real positive values.

I wonder if it will be 'gameable' - elementary school kids giving one another stars to pump their stats.


What.... am I missing with this project?

Umm, the fact that you haven't seen it yet?


Is star.me not accessible/visible to you?


It is, but I don't have an account yet. Do you?


Might want to make that sooner than just "in the coming days."


One thing I've learned from reading HN over the years: Few things kill the buzz of a new site like the introduction of legal/copyright issues.


I don't see the big deal; it's cosmetic. The logo's easy to remove. I can't imagine significant damages. Legal issues are only a problem when the content is infringing, such as video uploads.


I agree, it shouldn't overshadow other stuff. But that's the odd thing about those kinds of issues -- they tend to overshadow the work anyway.


Great idea!

Where is my e-mail going? What are you planning to do with it?

Also, there is no identification on who is running the project.


Hi. We're Chris (@chrisbaglieri), John (@codingjester), Josiah (@bluepojo), and Aaron (@aaronfeng). This company was born over the course of 54 hours at Philadelphia Startup Weekend.

The emails will be used once and only once, to announce when we're open to the public.


Thank you. Perhaps add that to the site and you'll give off a lot more "warm and fuzzies."


Added a quick note about only using emails once and only once. We'll add an about page in the coming day profiling each of us.


Interesting blog post about the use of an "opinionated" Perl web framework versus the long existing mantra of TIMTOWTDI (There Is More Than One Way To Do It).


Irrelevant to most, but the tangled mess of network cables behind the "Woz" in the interview really ticks me off. I'd love to have a word with the network folks there.


It was filmed at the Computer History Museum, so it's like that on purpose. Though, it doesn't look like this is the one, I know that they have one of Google's original racks which looks about as messy. (as seen here: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/03/building-a-computer...)


That's a CDC 6600 arm you're looking at, not a rack. They were limited by wire length (longer wires increased latency).


And I was getting big-headed this morning for solving a silly problem for a client. Thanks for reminding me of my place. :)


This is one of the last books that I'm still hoping will make it to a digital format somehow. I just can't see ordering a new paper copy again.


How about our good friend, C ?


11009


Thanks for sharing. We're you able to identify with Linode the outages for each datacenter or do the stats include any false positives?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: