Is this Extism, but running as a service? https://extism.org/ It seems to me that a key feature of Extism is host functions (which can be called from the sandbox). But maybe I'm not comparing apples to apples?
As a member of the Open edX technical oversight committee, and a long time core contributor, I’d like to comment on the future of Open edX — the open source project. I’m not an employee of Axim or 2U though, so I can’t say anything about their plans.
As OP explained, Axim is the only “cash-rich entity” to have emerged after the edX acquisition. They retained control of the open source Open edX project, and are now in charge of its maintenance and improvement. That is with the support of many open source contributors, of course.
For those who don’t know, Open edX is the piece of software on which runs edX.org, but also MITx and many other open online learning platforms around the world. It’s a big software project that has managed to carve a niche in a complex ecosystem.
The analysis that Axim is mostly a grant-giving organisation is very far from the reality. Yes, Axim is allocating part of its endowment to grants, though I don’t have much insight into this aspect of their mission. What I do know, is that Axim is also investing a very substantial amount of time and money in the development of the open source project, and that is no trivial feat. You can make your own opinion by checking the project activity on GitHub and the Open edX forum.
To put things simply, the open source project is undergoing an important transition where we have fewer dedicated engineers (because of the layoffs at 2U) but much better project management and focus (because the project roadmap is no longer dictated by edX). There’s also a lot of internal debate of where the project should be headed, strategically speaking (I have my own opinion, which you can find elsewhere). None of this would be possible without Axim and its financial independence.
This transition is long and complicated, and it’s not one we can accelerate just by throwing money at it. Also, I like to think of education as a complex ecosystem that improves in incremental steps. AI and personalised learning might play a role in that process, but they are most certainly not a panacea. It would be meaningless to invest these $735 million in such a narrow scope. Instead, it makes much more sense to to build a stable foundation for the future of open online learning.
In a nutshell: don’t give up on Open edX just yet, the best things are yet to come :)
The presentation we made in July at the Open edX 2024 conference with my colleague Faqir Bilal should be available on youtube soon-ish. The tl;dw is that we should focus on a different market vertical, which is residential/blended/hybrid learning.
Keep faith! It took me ~5 years to find the right position and a boss willing to accept remote, part-time work. Such positions exist, but you need to search hard.
I can't believe no one has mentioned LinkedIn yet. I have received virtually all my inbound contacts through my LinkedIn profile. Explicitely mention your new status ("consultant"/"freelancer" + your specialty) as your main activity and I can assure you you will get contract offers. They will not be the best in the world, but that will improve with time (and new connections).
It sounds like they're making an iSlapBracelet to me. That means the whole surface would potentially be a screen with just the part facing you being active.
I kind of wonder where else would be appropriate to wear it other than on your wrist, given that it explicitly mentions that (Geordi LaForge style visor perhaps?)
Depending on size of the band, strength of it 'closed' you could potentially wear it on your bicep like runners currently do with some iPods. I can't see it being moved off the wrist though, I'd assume appendage is to keep the language as broad as possible.
I think it's more just about covering the discrepancy between "child's wrist" and "adult's wrist". i.e. making sure the display doesn't try to render to a fixed size, when substantial portions of the 'band' may overlap.
I doubt they'd ship enough material to actually attach to a leg. And hopefully they're not just shipping an iSlapBracelet: a wrist computer needs to stay in place. Not spin around your wrist freely. Good luck to them in weighting such a device and getting it to stay in place.
According to the patent application, the slap bracelet is entirely covered with a flexible touchscreen. Sensors detect which side is facing the user. That way, it shouldn't matter whether the bracelet stays in place or not, the UI moves along with it.
Also, being a child of the 80s, I remember slap bracelets quite well, and in my experience, they fit quite snug and didn't move around much at all.
They also had no weight to them and what little weight they had was well-distributed.
Unless this hypothetical snap-bracelet device also had its weight very well distributed, it's going to tend to spin. Particularly if the total weight is sufficient to cause the snap-bracelet to slide toward 'open', even a bit, as your wrist rotates or travels through the air. And evenly distributing the weight over an entire-surface-screen would be quite a challenge, given the internals.
I think it more likely a production device along those lines would have a series of fixed potential-attachment-points and strong magnets to counter the forces caused by the weight of the device and movement of the wrist. And the screen wouldn't need to be over the entire device, but simply enough of the 'top' so that it could reasonably serve the various potential-attachment-point configurations. (the magnets would also provide a simple and consistent way to determine just how open or closed the device is)
