I don't know if I agree or not with his views, but the fact that he's moving from complaining about something, to doing something about his beliefs, has convinced me to move from a negative to a significantly positive view of him, as a person; to reiterate, regardless of whether I agree with said views.
The will to fight for what one believes in - I think we can all agree that is an admirable human trait that would result, for those who do follow his views, in him being labeled as a hero and defender of people's rights.
> He once tweeted that seven of the city’s supervisors — all progressives — should “die slow, motherfuckers” in a late-night polemic. The tweet, which Tan said was a joke, prompted hateful mail and police reports.
Yeah, my benefit of the doubt (which was already zero for a rich person in politics) is negative.
We are introducing Verifiably Private AI [1] which actually solves all of the issues you mention. Everything across the entire chain is verifiably private (or in other words, transparent to the user in such a way they can verify what is running across the entire architecture).
This follows after djb pointed out that the NSA was weakening encryption by recommending and demanding PQ encryption alone instead of the hybrid PQ+ECC pair that is safer, with this being blocked despite considerable opposition by the actual experienced researcher participants in the group.
> At various times in history, the White House has been known as the “President’s Palace,” the “President’s House,” and the “Executive Mansion.”
I wonder how much longer the structure will be known by its current name, given the growing trend of letting slanderous/fringe uses of words dictate their dominant meanings [1].
The will to fight for what one believes in - I think we can all agree that is an admirable human trait that would result, for those who do follow his views, in him being labeled as a hero and defender of people's rights.
Bravo, Garry.