What's gross is that kind of language policing.

Why do you feel good about programming despite not writing in machine code?

False equivalence. x86 assembly is a programming language, C is a programming language, Javascript is a programming language. English is NOT a programming language.

If it was, you wouldn't need "AI" to convert English into a real programming language before that, in turn, can be converted to machine code.

My boss can make people do countless things in the proper order, with just a few words. Sounds like a programming language to me.

I enjoyed that too when I was a youngster but there are good reasons why it is impractical for day to day work.

I actually thought this was going to be an article about talking with an AI, i.e., something with no feelings, not about interacting with other human beings. Treating all social cushioning as useless noise is simplistic. Communication between humans is not the same as communication with a compiler. The problem is verbosity, and lack of clarity, not politness. Those are different things

Except him being wealthy could just as well be used to support the argument for using GPL instead of gifting. "He does not have to make real money off of it, he is privileged".

If "the solution" depends on people changing their behaviour on their own (ideally by lowering their expectations/do the harder thing/etc), it is almost never "the solution". It is usually just wishful thinking.

Pets.com

What I find surprising is that I knew Altman is a horrible human being and a terrible steward of the AI revolution, yet I still got disappointed.

> You could use exactly the same argument for not bothering about doing things that pollute, generate landfill, or generally make things worse for society.

Which is why those things need laws to create any meaningful change.

That's not a justification for participating in them yourself, though.

Well, perhaps it has something to do with the fact that they started using webviews for stuff like system UI: https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2022/inspecting-web-views-in-ma...

Genuine question, not trying to throw a shade or anything, but are those cores actually useful with the state of apple intelligence being what it is?

They are also used by ML models that are deeply integrated in macos and ios without you knowing. Like object and text detection in images.

And help in Photos, Final Cut Pro, and other apps.

I wish they would (or wouldn't if they are) hook it up to the ios keyboard.

If you strip away the branding, Apple has and continues to ship a ton of algorithms that likely use the ANE and end users can use CoreML to do the same.

Just some things that people will likely take for granted that IIRC Apple have said use the ANE or at least would likely benefit from it: object recognition, subject extraction from images and video, content analysis, ARKit, spam detection, audio transcription.

Don’t forget FaceID and many of the image manipulation.

And while everyone else went to more powerful giant LLMs, Apple moved most of Siri from the cloud to your device. Though they do use both (which you can see when Siri corrects itself during transcription—you get the local Siri version corrected later by the cloud version).

IIRC, FaceID has been a thing before ML entered the picture.

FaceID was introduced along side the ANE. It was its reason d’être when introduced.

Apple's OSes run a lot of local ML models for many tasks that aren't branded as Apple Intelligence, and they have done so for many years now.

This is a nice article. Thanks for sharing.

You can convert your own ML models to MLX to use them; Apple Intelligence is not the only application.

MLX does not run on NPUs AFAIK; just gpu and cpu. You have to use CoreML to officially run code on the neural engine.

Even then there is no transparency on how it decides what runs on the ANE/GPU etc

Correct. OS level stuff get first priority, so you can’t count on using it.

Turns out third party actually gets priority for ANE