I was diagnosed at university. Around my freshman year, which is over 10 years ago. In my country there were not many ADHD specialists and medications in circulation at first, mostly atomoxetine was used, but it made me sick (nausea, stomach pain).
Eventually Concerta was introduced to the local market and things got much better with it.
After migrating to Europe, I was re-diagnosed by a good specialist with all the right methodologies and then got prescriptions for Elvanse (in the US it's kind of like Vyvanse, I think) 30mg and clonazepam 1mg to control anxiety.
Been taking it for a couple years now, works pretty well.
Not so long ago I have seen studies on which Elvanse is considered almost the best drug among analogs, so I can only recommend it. It is quite mild and has a long release.
From personal experience: it is better to refrain from coffee and caffeinated drinks in general when taking medication.
Ah, btw, hope it will be useful (just personal exp)
I have tried different sleep medications, but the one that worked best for me was Mirtazapine. Although it is an atypical tetracyclic antidepressant, it works well before bedtime, plus it can be taken not regularly, but only when needed.
My doctor and I tried escitalopram (lexapro?) and setraline, but the former turned me into a sleepy vegetable 18 hours a day, I could stay in bed all day, or even all week, even with the lowest dosage.
The second one had no effect at all, whether I drank it or not.
I also tried Quetiapine for sleep, it has a plus in that it does not cause any dependence and it is easy to stop taking it, but its effectiveness is so bad, although it is better than nothing if you have terrible problems with sleep.
I had to cease Mirtazipine due to nightmares - or more specifically, because I was waking my wife up from the screaming. Never happened before nor since, and I can remember some of them still. Terrifying
Really? As far as I know, the most authoritative ranking in academia is the Shanghai ranking[0], where, apart from outliners in the US with gigabudgets, most of the top are made up of European universities.
The top looks rather like that, except for a “bunch” of mega popular US universities, the rest are quite mediocre.
>For devices like Simula One, it's dead on arrival due to the mindshare of the Oculus / Meta Quest.
I don't understand why you (and other users here) compare this to Oculus.
Oculus is a Redmi phone of VR. Yeah, people buy it, and most individuals (~70% of steam users) buy 1080 monitors.
Still, there is a considerable market for 6k Apple Displays or 4k monitors. And people still buy top-tier phones for ~1k USD when they can buy a model for 250-300 and get 90% features and performance (usually except camera) of a 1k device.
I got Oculus Quest and used a few other VR and still will consider Simula because it's a device for me, someone who buys 6k Apple Display, 64 GB ram laptops, and 3080Ti GPU. Someone who wants crisp fonts, high PPI, optimized DE for Linux system.
Because I need it for my needs, and there are million people like me.
>Some of these people in Ukraine are hardcore neo-Nazis, and we are giving them weapons
And still, there is Trump in the US who won the race and mass shooting from nazis. Why does the US get any weapons?
It's strange rhetoric because there are many nazis in the US with regular hate crimes in media, but it will be hard to find any hate crimes in Ukraine.
Politically, nazi apologists in the US government got much more support than in Ukraine. From the last news after parliament election
>The main mouthpiece of the nationalists, Yarosh scored 0.7% of the vote in the presidential elections. In Russia, Sobchak (one of the opposition leaders) scored about the same. The number of seats in the parliament is 1 (one) for the nationalists from the "Samopomich" party, while the pro-Russian "OB" has 6. There is no right sector (nationalist supporters) at all in the new gathering.
Even with Putin's message that there are "no country like Ukraine, no Ukrainian language and culture, no Ukrainians as people at all," all that things that black people also can see in the US, there are LESS nationalist supporters than Russian supporters (a country, who started proxy war for 8 years already) in Ukraine.
Yeah, it feels strange to have these images.
There are already discussions to change them in Ukrainian community because it's not really connected to what organization do.
People from Ukraine IT community don't care because they got all the information about the organization without language barriers, but this images seems to be a problem from the outside perspective as this is the first thing that people would notice.
Anyway, thank you for your feedback (I'm not from the organization, I know a few people who help there)
>If you want to code in Haskell or Lisp in Europe, good luck.
I can agree with points around salary and diploma, but not on that one.
Scala, Haskell, Ocaml, Clojure, Coq, Idris are much more significant in the EU than in the US. Many Ph.D. contribute to language and ecosystem, and you can easily find exciting projects with them, not only crypto.
Even GHC was developed mainly by the EU and British people. The Swiss academy created Scala. Coq and Ocaml are big in French academy circles.
It's also a problem for me because I'm working from Eastern Europe (I can pay only 5% tax on all income up to 250k euro on remote).
I primarily work with US companies, salaries are outstanding, but usually interesting FP-ish things are done in the EU, where wages are lower.
And I am on remote, so there is no profit for me to earn less with better social and government benefits like people in West Europe.
There is an insightful summary of all the issues from HashiCorp founder when trying to establish an international remote-first company.
I can agree on almost everything from his post because my employer (startup) is trying to do the same, we are a US-company, in the process of acquiring by one of the giants, and I'm working and living in Ukraine with a US-based contract.
I like to think about NFT as an easy method of buying art from artists. There are many platforms for this with classical purchase mechanics, but as an artist myself, I love the idea of an auction-based platform for this era of digital art.
Right now, there are no mechanism for extraordinary digital artists to make their art expensive like IRL art. The best thing is you can do commissions for people, but it's hard for them to maintain their rights (both for artist and customer).
Maybe NFT will be more prominent with some "data registry" between platforms to make it global to check your rights on items, and great artists can sell their art for a more reasonable price.
For now, IRL art is like a "club for friends," and digital artists are not taken as seriously as they, even when digital one draw some almost masterpieces and spent 3-6 months on every item.
But you don't own the art. You own the receipt for the purchase of a hash of the specific digital format the art is stored in.
Note that there are definitely currently ways for digital artists to make expensive art, and that's in the form of commissions. If you really want to support an artist, find one you really like, and pay for a commission from them. You may also be able to pay more for forms of copyright (like reproduction).
NFTs are the worst possible way for artists to make money from digital art.
Many artists do not want to do commissions. In fact, you could argue that people who want commissions are very selfish. Not only do they want to force artists to work on their thing, often driven by vanity, they even want to own the copyrights to the work!
NFT buyers are clearly more respectful of an artists craft: They buy the work the artist really wanted to create, and they respect the fact that they cannot be the owner of the work in a moral sense.
Not so; many (but not the majority) NFTs (like Board Ape Yacht Club) come with very liberal licenses that afford the owner of the NFT the ability to do a lot with them.
This year I started my leetcode grinding for interview purposes. But when I look back, I can tell that's all this practice and analysis of solutions made me a much better engineer than before.
The most impactful thing in my 6+ year career was my understanding of how to think effectively about my code.
Before that, I got some basic knowledge about CS theory, master theorem, asymptotic, all these things, and was a typical skeptical developer who was thinking like, "yeah, that's cool, but you don't actually need it. At all, basic knowledge is enough."
Today, I will recommend that anyone go through basic algo and ds courses (Sedgwick book or course, Skiena book too) and try to practice them.
Now I'm even trying to participate in leetcode and codeforces contests. In the end, after the first months of frustration about how stupid I was and how I couldn't find a solution to easy problems, it's started to be fun, and I loved it.
