Network operators are the ones driving O-RAN - they have the most to gain: cheaper equipment & more supplier options. However interoperability is not as easy as you might hope, even with an open standard.
>However interoperability is not as easy as you might hope, even with an open standard.
Came here to say this. Rather than being all interoperable / plug and play, you wind up having to validate different combinations of hardware from different vendors... which then has to get revalidated when new versions of software are rolled out.
Every time I go through Brighton I am struck by how if it was anywhere else in the world it would be an expensive neighbourhood. I never knew about the ownership of the mall.
My theory is the dynamics I mentioned above. Investors waiting for it to boom so they can cash in, however investors allow decay so values never rise.
Meanwhile be very careful buying anything in Brighton within the 1:50 year floodzone which is a huge percentage of the homes (And beware in much of Christchurch). You think your odds are okay, but sea level rise means the risk increases over 20 years, and the sum of the risk ends up very freaking high over decades.
If there is flooding, it will be like the earthquake. Prices will drop drastically within whole suburbs, houses will become uninsurable, and as-is prices will occur. Some suburbs will become very undesirable, which will have severe negative value. If you have a mortgage, you can lose all your money due to gearing.
Meanwhile over time insurance premiums are going sky-high - mine went up 33% last year and I’m on a higher part!
Don’t buy in floodzone areas.
I am going to buy a bare property on the hills to hedge my potential losses since I can’t insure against sea level rise. If there is sea level rise, my property will decrease in value, but hopefully that is offset by an increase in value of a hillside property.
Yes, my extremely layman pet theory is that dark matter / energy are the evidence of advanced intelligent civilisations too; just we don't understand what we're looking at yet.
Why not? CO2 levels in blood must be tightly controlled. It probably can't get twice as high as usual.
If there's already 4% of CO2 in the air around you it's an immediate danger. While you can spend 10 minutes in 3%.
If your body could bump up CO2 in exhaled air from 4% to 8% then you'd probably have bo problem surviving in air thay contains 4%.
Its a mix of anerobic and erobic exercis. Its hard to keep the same heart rate while biking. So sometimes the body doesnt need oxygen to burn fuel. So it doesnt exhale co2. As said I am no expert.
That might be it. Thank you. If anyone wants to read more about it it's called Cori Cycle and it doesn't require oxygen and it doesn't produce CO2.
But you'll need to get energy eventually from normal beathing to recycle lactic acid back into glucose in the liver.
So probably after an hour of intense exercise you'll be breathing out more CO2 in the following hours as your body clears up lactic acid.
What's interesting is you get 2ATP from making lactate, but you need 6ATP to recycle lactate back into glucose.
Would that mean that for burning more calories you should have as much of anerobic excercises as possible because it's really ineficient use of glucose?
Thanks for the hint. I didnt know that one needs co2 to get rid of lactact
And to that question as said I am nonexpert. Imho sport after a certain (1h or so) time is a mix of both and should burn most calories in a healthy way. As far as I know there was a downside to having too much lactat. And burning calories aint synonym with burning body fat. Short intensity anerobic training is not atacking bodyfat in my opinion. It only uses the reserv in carbs we have anyway ( around 2000kcal)
Biking is the best exercise for bodyfatburning in my opinion. If it is more than 2h.
In engineering, a code can refer to a simulation package itself; eg automotive engine design software like Ricardo WAVE. To me, it always seemed to be how mechanical engineers referred to software.
