Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mpalmer's commentslogin

> no downside

That is not the view their legal department takes, I guarantee it. Congress ain't gonna keep its composition indefinitely.


I see the problem. You're supposed to read history in the other direction.

I get what you’re saying, but this is important enough that it doesn’t feel like nitpicking:

You’re not going to learn anything from history if you only read it in one direction.


No means of law enforcement should be so secret that even the legal basis for it can't be revealed to voters. If that renders said means impractical, too goddamn bad.

    Your ideological opposition to that is not shared by as wide a percentage of developers as you may think based on some highly self selected online corners.

Opinions do not win by "high score". Asserting the validity of opinions based on how widely they are held is dumb.

If 30% of devs love openclaw, I'm not re-examining my informed opinion, I am forming a new one about that 30% cohort.


That was a reaction to "Not sure why this gets voted to the frontpage.", not to any correctness claims.

    Gatekeeper blocks the app immediately. You'll see either "TUIStudio cannot be opened because it is from an unidentified developer" or "TUIStudio is damaged and can't be opened" on newer macOS after quarantine flags the binary.
    To get past it: right-click the .app → Open → Open anyway — or go to System Settings → Privacy & Security → "Open Anyway".
A trusting, highly positive person could really be taken advantage of here.

Yes, but they are also in alpha, and you can’t actually export any code, so it’s pretty functionally useless.

Neat concept though if it ends up working.


Are you producing this solely for LLMs to read? If not, you should edit the material more thoughtfully.

You're presenting yourself as a subject matter expert, and I'm having trouble distinguishing your original thoughts because they are bogged down in seemingly unedited slop prose.

It's apparent that you asked the model to keep its sentences short and the content digestible, but the result is unbearable, it reads like it's written in monotone.

I don't enjoy reading 20 sets of 4-5 bullet points which look exactly the same. Where's the emphasis? Why are you telling me 17 times that single-number scores are bad and multic-metric gates are good?

And of course, seven(!) instances of the most glaring canary:

    Golden sets are not just datasets. They are versioned cases plus a scoring contract.

    A useful golden set is not just a folder of examples. It is a contract with explicit fields.

    They work with those systems. They do not replace them.

    [..] evaluation is not a one-time report. It is a release gate.

    You do not need a specialized eval platform to start. You need disciplined case design and a willingness to treat scoring as engineering rather than ceremony.

    That is not the gate being annoying. That is the gate doing its job.

    That is not academic ceremony. That is how you keep AI systems from slowly degrading while every weekly update insists things are "looking strong".

Fair criticism.

I was aiming for “field guide / reference doc” structure rather than a looser essay voice, which is why the piece is so contract-heavy and sectional. But I think you’re right that the repetition probably started doing the opposite of what it was supposed to do and dulled the emphasis.

That’s fixable, and I’ll tighten it.


I read through the entire article and couldn't find the part where this phenomenon causes or otherwise explains intense pain and detectable traumatic brain injuries.

> Like their human counterparts, Aaru’s bots are fallible; for instance, they wrongly forecast a Kamala Harris victory in the 2024 election. Fink said the firm has significantly improved its models since then.

Anyone else do a mental double take after reading this bit? What other big things has it gotten wrong, then?


You've been a Mac user since the original candy iMacs and you don't see the company design ethos slipping in the last five years?

What would you say NixOS config starters are missing? I'm teetering on abandoning Apple unless they can right the UX ship, and I was hoping to build on one of those when I switch.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: