As far as I know <b> and <i> is not deprecated at all. It’s just not recommended for 95% of the use cases.

They're not quite deprecated, but they're also not quite not deprecated at all:

> Historically, the <b> element was meant to make text boldface. Styling information has been deprecated since HTML4, so the meaning of the <b> element has been changed.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Reference/...

You are joking, right? Writing c with llm‘s… what can go wrong?!

ingress-nginx is older than 5-7 years tough. In that time frame you would’ve needed to update your Linux system, which gets hairy most often as well. The sad thing is just that the replacement is just not there and gateway api has a lot of drawbacks that might get fixed in the next release (working with cert manager)

Uf that also means that the business api is affected? to pull invoices and stuff. https://developer-docs.amazon.com/amazon-business/docs/downl... not sure if that will be paid as well

Gcp still can’t change our street address because of the d-u-n-s validation (of course d-u-n-s actually uses our new address… and all other vendors are fine with it). How bad must their service be that they can’t change a fucking address. Oh and the free billing support is horrible, always the same response like ‘a special team is working on it’.. yeah sure and they can’t fix an address for like a month. It’s worse since all our invoices use the old address which in Germany is a fucking problem. Time to make a migration plan.

I don’t think the language is unprofessional, it’s direct and it states his opinion.

The one demanding it is the maintainer of keepassxc it would’ve been better to just close the issue that this is a Debian only problem and he should install it like that and just close it.

Just reading the blog post makes me wonder if they really saved 500k. How long did it take them to build the solution, how many people built it, how much does the new service cost while it’s running? How many ops ours does the new service need? The blog goes into many details that I doubt that they built it in less than a month. So maybe they will save money over years but they probably lost money while building the new solution

Some hyperscalers even have services for that. Which even makes it possible to have cross cluster ingress. And other things. And it makes it possible to have multiple cluster ingress different regions that somewhat work together.

Most camping places in France/spain that do have cee or type e/f might limit to 6a/10a. Fyi. It’s mostly to limit power draw since you pay a flat fee.

California is basically the Camping variant of the earlier t3 and nowadays multivan (t7). It has a big history and used different frames (t4-t5) in the past. But it’s not a us thing. The first version was really close to a us only Model tough.