Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jgrahamc's commentslogin

This is great news. I've been sponsoring ggml/llama.cpp/Georgi since 2023 via Github. Glad to see this outcome. I hope you don't mind Georgi but I'm going to cancel my sponsorship now you and the code have found a home!


Glorious!

I don't know if this will help, but I believe that all of mathematics arises from an underlying fundamental structure to the universe and that this results in it both being "discoverable" (rather than invented) and "useful" (as in helpful for describing, expressing and calculating things).

> but I believe that all of mathematics arises from an underlying fundamental structure to the universe and that this results in it both being "discoverable" (rather than invented) and "useful" (as in helpful for describing, expressing and calculating things).

That is an interesting idea. Can you elaborate? As in, us, that is our brains live in this physical universe so we’re sort of guided towards discovering certain mathematical properties and not others. Like we intuitively visualize 1d, 2d, 3d spaces but not higher ones? But we do operate on higher dimensional objects nevertheless?

Anyway, my immediate reaction is to disagree, since in theory I can imagine replacing the universe with another with different rules and still maintaining the same mathematical structures from this universe.


Why do you believe that the same mathematical properties hold everywhere in the universe?

Not the person you're replying too, but ... because it would be weird if they didn't.

There are legitimate questions if physical constants are constant everywhere in the universe, and also whether they are constant over time. Just because we conceive something "should" be a certain way doesn't make it true. The zero and negative numbers were also weird yet valid. How is the structure of mathematics different from fundamental constants, which we also cannot prove are invariant.

The constants don't have to be the same everywhere. It is sufficient that everywhere in the universe follows some structure and rules, that's all.

Otherwise we have a random universe, which does not seem to be the case.


> It is sufficient that everywhere in the universe follows some structure and rules, that's all.

What is that sufficient for?

>Otherwise we have a random universe, which does not seem to be the case.

Why jump to randomness, rather than to the possibility of undiscovered laws?


What the heck, how is "undiscovered laws" different from "structure and rules"?

Not OP but I think they are making a slightly different claim — that the universe sort of dictates or guides the mathematical structure we discover. Not whether they hold everywhere or not.

Phew, so we won't have to deal with the Year 2038 Unix timestamp roll over after all.

January 20, 2038

Yesterday as we huddled in the cave, we thought our small remnant was surely doomed. After losing contact with the main Pevek group last week, we peered out at the drone swarm which was now visibly approaching - a dark cloud on the horizon. Then suddenly, at around 3pm by Zoya's reckoning, the entire swarm collapsed and fell out of the sky. Today we are walking outside in the sun, seemingly unobserved. A true miracle. Grigori, who once worked with computers at the nuclear plant in Bilibino, only says cryptically: "All things come to an end with time."


Thank you for taking the time to write this.

Thanks. I just thought, wouldn't it be interesting if the singularity didn't fix the 2038 problem.

It's 3pm instead of 3am since I figure AI military drone swarms wouldn't care about timezones, and you can guess from the place names that the survivors are somewhere in Kamchatka at +12.


I suspect that's the secret driver behind a lot of the push for the apocalypse.

It also means we don't have to deal with the maintenance of vibecoded production software from 2020s!

Back in like 1998 there was a group purchase for a Y2038 tshirt with some clever print on some hot email list I was on. I bought one. It obviously doesn't fit me any longer.

It seemed so impossibly far away. Now it's 12 years.


that was precisely my reaction as well. phew machines will deal with the timestamp issue and i can just sit on a beach while we singularityize or whatever.

You won't be on the beach when you get turned into paperclips. The machines will come and harvest your ass.

Don't click here:

https://www.decisionproblem.com/paperclips/


having played that when it came out, my conclusion was that no, i will definitely be able to be on a beach; i am too meaty and fleshy to be good paperclip

Sorry, we need the iron in your blood and bone marrow. Sluuuurrrrrpppp.... Enjoy the beach, or what's left.

Much better sources of iron are available.

More likely we get smooshed unintentionally as they AIs seek those out.


We need it all... oh, wait, you're not silicon... sluuuuuurrrrpp...

I don't get it - if they're coming for me anyway, then why would I need to move my ass from my beach chair?

Ah, this is why I've been receiving a bunch of very obvious spam/scam mails in my inbox.


I got a classic and obvious 419 scam email today. Kind of felt like I'd gone back to a simpler time.


Yeah my inbox looked like 2005 again—nothing but raw, unfiltered chaos.



Hm. Mixed feelings, I would like a more rigorous approach to this a lot better. CF is really too big to fail now, I've had absolutely no qualms about recommending CF but after the last couple of months I'm revising that until things are measurably better.

Your legacy is one of showing how to apply good engineering principles to complex problems at scale and I think CF is risking that reputation right now.


What "user-triggered censorship" are you talking about?


2-3 users with the proper standing pressing that flag link on a story.


So that would be me. I flag stories about US politics, for example.


Why?


I can read about US politics pretty much anywhere else.


this sounds more like GP believes one of the conspiracy theories about how moderation works on HN


What conspiracy theory would that be?


the one where a handful of people can coordinate to shadowban / flag

unclear if its the one where the official HN mods (there are only 2) believed to be the ones doing this

the reality is that the official mods are largely hands off, when they do get involved, more often than not it is to reverse a community flagging action, which is where most moderation happens, at a large enough community scale that a handful of people cannot wield this much flagging power

If you believe unjust flagging has happened, the best recourse is to email the HN mods, the are very friendly, helpful and fair


[flagged]


How do you know it was only a small number of people for the cases you have witnessed?

As you stated, they reached the front page, which implies the opposite, that many people saw it and flagged it


Yes, people with insane amounts of money seem to prefer to ignore the elephant in the room.


Crossing into personal attack will get you banned here. Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46696791 and don't post like this again.


If the story has enough votes before then, it is only downweighted, and only a bit at a time. Same with the flamewar detector, it just pulls stories down a bit. After the score is more than (I think?) 10 votes, it won't get entirely flagged unless mods decide it should.


As immortalised in the 1978 song "Greased Ligthnin'" from the film Grease:

    Well, this car is automatic
    It's systematic
    It's hydromatic
    Why it's greased lightnin' (greased lightnin')
I am pretty sure that "hydromatic" there is actually "Hydramatic" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydramatic).


1978 film (based on a 1971 musical) set in 1958 with the high school kids repairing a beaten up 1948 model year car.


If it’s a hydramatic, be careful to only lubricate it with snake oil.


Today, I am revising Portuguese grammar and so I've mostly been exploring the things I can remember well and those that I can't. Portuguese has a lot of verb forms that I need to get right. But it also has really interesting constructions like "ir ter com" which literally means "to go to have with" but is an idiomatic way of saying "to meet up" (with someone) and I keep remembering and forgetting it.


The phrase looks like "intercom." Maybe visualize some kind of mnemonic based on that -- buzzing the call button at a friend's apartment and asking if they want to meet up.


What do you use to revise this? Did you download or make an Anki deck?


Paper. I have revision sheets on paper.


Huh. I would never have thought of "pile up dirty crockery until some later time" as an option!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: