Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fs111's commentslogin

> The STF is run by politologists with no clue. They fund flashy web apps that they "understand" and packaging.

That is complete nonsense. Where do you get this "information"?

https://www.sovereign.tech/tech lists OpenSSL, rusttls, Junit, pipewire, samba, varnish-cache, curl, Fortran, even friggin GNU coreutils and others. None of those are "flashy web apps".


Note that STF did not fund GNU coreutils. They funded uutils.


They are a non profit, not a company and you can have private repos. You are spreading misinformation.


Dude, just read the TOS, jesus: https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/faq/#how-about-pri...

It's not misinformation, just read their own page:

If you use more than 100 MB of private storage for the use cases mentioned earlier, please send us a request and we can evaluate it.

If you do not contribute to any free/libre software project at all, Codeberg is unfortunately not the right place for you. However, check out the alternatives, we're sure you'll find a cozy place for your work.


...in what way whatsoever is this "They dont allow private repos"?

The size limit is........a size limit, something every host should have; there's one for public codeberg repos too.

And while there are restrictions on what private repos are allowed, there are also restrictions on what public repos are allowed too, and it's extremely clear that neither requirement is equivalent to "they don't allow [public / private] repos".

My reading of that section is that, besides the size limit, the rules on private repos are, to an extent, less strict than of public repos; anyone who falls under your second quoted sentence couldn't have any public repos either, by the nature of public repos needing to be FOSS.


It doesn't matter. You don't shit where you eat. You can, but you shouldn't.


Where I eat doesn't have a "WC" sign, walls separating it from public areas, and a toilet present. Codebergs private repos have a clear "private" label, infrastructure for making them, acknowledgement and rules for it in ToS, and they are kept private.

Anyway, originally I didn't quite agree with fs111 on straight up calling your post misinformation, but I guess it is indeed your intent to completely ignore facts and just say random garbage.




Link does not work, goes into loop at verify human check with some weird redirect

Looks like you appended the original URL to the end


Probably related to the reasoning behind: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-a...

Or you're using Cloudflare DNS.


I may be using CF DNS 1.1.1.1, for a while if so, and only seeing the issue today. It definitely seems specific to me at this point.

Have they changed something on their end?


Huh, it's working for me (on Firefox).


For the love of god, please google, give us personal access tokens and not this Oauth madness inside GCP. It is impossible to get that in any big enterprise.


I have a little terminal llm thing that has a --bofh switch which make it talk like the BOFH. Very refereshing to interact with it :-)


The only thing that ever really worked for me is taskwarrior.org. It is super easy to get started and can be made more sophisticated as you. I live in the terminal most of the time anyway so that makes it a natural fit.


> I never heard of any certificate authority offering that.

DigiCert does. That is where 1.1.1.1 and 9.9.9.9 get their valid certificates from


Most CAs offer them, the only requirement is that it's at least an OV (not DV) level cert, and the subject organization proves it owns the IP address.


No, it is not DNS over HTTPS it is DNS over TLS, which is different.


Android 11 and newer support both DoH and DoT.


Where is this option? How can I distinguish the two, the dialog simply asks for a host name


Google is one of the most valuable brands ever. Everyone knows it. It is even used for "searching the web" openai is not that strong of a brand


I think for the general public ChatGPT is a much stronger brand than OpenAI itself.


Google is a far bigger brand than ChatGPT and OpenAI combined.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: