The money quote, after several pages of did-you-try-submitting-a-ticket and no-the-other-ticket-system-via-the-help-pages:
> Sorry for the inconvenience here, currently we do not have the ability to revoke the free Universal SSL certificates, however, after disabling Universal SSL, the certificates are removed from our edge. If you enable it again, new certificates are issued, since we do not have those old certificates anymore.
> However, depending on the issuer you may be able to request their revocation directly with the CA:
Though I've never served in armed forces, nor participated in armed conflict, I think C&C does a pretty good approximation of being an (overwhelmed) officer in command of a small area conflict, where you do have to give exact orders to everyone for every little thing.
I think a huge improvement to RTS in general would be allowing multiple players to command the same army, so that each can be responsible for a small portion of all the different tasks you describe.
Perhaps, but many RTS games don't even bother with stuff that would also work on small scale. High ground, effect of various terrain types. Slower movement, terrain which only infantry can cross. Garrisoned structures. C&C has this stuff, Starcraft or Warcraft never did (specific single structures but not neutral buildings). Small scale you say? What about directional armor and flanking, crossfire.
CS:GO is a very accessible first person shooter game suitable for all skill levels. It changes little over years and visuals are far from state of art. But they've figured out the formula for FUN. It's not exactly my cup of tea, but if you can do this for FPS you can probably find a FUN real time strategy formula as well. A formula that's not overly complicated and doesn't feel like juggling balls for 25 minutes. I think Starcraft is not that formula.
I would assume avoiding plastics and other non-biodegradable packaging materials, avoiding waste by purchasing repairable things and repairing when needed, avoiding companies that are know polluters and seeking companies actively working to do the things I listed here as well.
Just wanted to say that I enjoyed reading the article. I liked the overall quality and that important bits have citations. I hadn't heard of your website before but I'll be sure to read more of your work in the future.
The web is amazing in its level of backwards compatibility, in that you can make a website compatible with all of these browsers from the 90s today!
Retro-computing growth is exploding based on what I see here and on Facebook, and it could be the key to saving the Web's openness.
I'm working on a project which allows for easily building hybrid static-dynamic sites compatible with Mosaic+, and I am grateful to others working to preserve this technology.
This is how it seems to me too. I still have their hardware I got years ago and it works great, but it's been a couple of years since I've decided to refuse any software upgrades from them, and to avoid their hardware. Their attitude seems to be getting more and more "our way or the highway", and I'm not interested in playing those games.
Previously I already switched from Windows to Mac as my primary environment, so going to GNU/*ix was not a big stretch. I already know several non-hackers who have gone this route as well.
It's funny how 7 seems to be the magic number with peak quality and usefulness in commercial OS development before it devolves into bloat and user abuse.
Android 7 was the last version before crazy restrictions like blocking screenshots for Incognito Mode started taking effect.
Windows 7 was the last decent version of Windows before it went downhill with 8 and then going full-on spyware-as-a-service with 10.
System 7 was the last release of MacOS before it started bloating.
OS X Lion (10.7) was the last release before Gatekeeper.
Thank you so much for this guide! I haven't finished reading it yet, but I alredy understand more about Git than I did before. All the diagrams, in particular, are very helpful.
> Sorry for the inconvenience here, currently we do not have the ability to revoke the free Universal SSL certificates, however, after disabling Universal SSL, the certificates are removed from our edge. If you enable it again, new certificates are issued, since we do not have those old certificates anymore.
> However, depending on the issuer you may be able to request their revocation directly with the CA: