A lot of people in these comments have strong opinions about the performance of a service they use frequently, for which they pay zero dollars, and is run by a public company with a fiduciary duty to provide ROI to its investors.

I wonder how many of them would switch to a paid model that offered pre-ai-era google search?

I’m just waiting for someone to announce they made a classic Google search engine alternative (which they coded using AI).

Did you just agree to a stranger's counterpoint on the internet? This post should be in a museum somewhere

>How I sped up <important_tech_stack> by 2.8%

>something apolitical, filled with political bot comments

>ShowHN: an ai company you'll never hear of again

>NAILING JELLY TO THE GODDAMN WALL, !%#@ YEA (2005)

>why ai is bad

Keep it up HN <3

recent changes in their comment system have reduced my exposure to bots to a level I much prefer over every other platform I use

How recent? As recently as last weekend I was seeing blue check marks replying with AI generated only-technically-related replies on top of the majority of the posts I looked at.

If that's actually true, good for them, but after what I've witnessed there not that long ago, I doubt I'll try it ever again.

There are bots here too, lot of them, to a point that rules were amended, this is because it's very valuable to give points to new publications

This sounds like something an AI would write. It even uses the em-dash several times.

Let the witch trials commence.

>Are we not madly harvesting the world’s resources in a monomaniacal attempt to optimize artificial intelligence?

No, we are not madly harvesting the world's resources in a monomaniacal attempt to optimize artificial intelligence. We are, however, harvesting the world's resources in an attempt to optimize artificial intelligence.