Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | autoexec's commentslogin

ebooks already dont have a great track record when it comes to preservation. (https://old.reddit.com/r/kindle/comments/18csl9d/all_books_g...) At least Amazon can't break into my house to steal the copy of 1984 I paid for, when somehow they're allowed to remote into my device and delete my purchases whenever they feel like it. Bitrot is real too. Paper books can last a pretty long time (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Cuthbert_Gospel)

There are downsides to both formats, but with paper there's no company keeping track of the date/time I open the books on my selves, or how often I open them, or how long I spend on each page, or how long I take to read the whole thing. I also don't have to worry about the books on my shelves being remotely and silently censored or edited. I don't have to worry about ads being inserted into them and I can freely read them and sell/loan them to others long after they've been banned.


Everything you said after "with paper" applies to ebooks, provided you get them without DRM. Your objections are to DRM, not to ebooks in general.

If it helps, the bright white pages yellow with age. It'd be nice if dark mode caught on as an option. https://darkeditionbooks.com/ tries, but it looks like they don't have much more than works in the public domain.

Goodreads is now an amazon marketing website filled with astroturf and review bombing.

> modern layoffs in aggregate are at least partially (~20%) intended and communicated as being ways to get rid of 'low performers',

In my experience they're often used to get rid of high wage earners and people with benefits no longer offered by company. Those people then get replaced with new hires who get paid less and have fewer benefits.


Web search is a thing that is increasingly filled with AI slop that drowns out actual content. "wading through sites" for me means "wading through sites returned in search results".

lots of outgoing requests, including

<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com">

<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.gstatic.com" crossorigin>

<script src="https://www.gstatic.com/firebasejs/9.23.0/firebase-app-compat.js"></script>

<script src="https://www.gstatic.com/firebasejs/9.23.0/firebase-auth-compat.js"></script>

<script src="https://www.gstatic.com/firebasejs/9.23.0/firebase-database-compat.js"></script>

<script src="capacitor.js"></script>

<script src="capacitor-cordova.js"></script>

<script src="https://static.cloudflareinsights.com/beacon.min.js/


There's certainly a % of mac users who prioritize aesthetics over function. I feel like there's got to be a way to do this in a way that's more attractive though. Maybe something more gradual or even.

I wonder what Apple estimates this percentage to be given some of their design decisions.

I suspect that with all things Apple 10% really care, 80% are indifferent and 10% really hate it. The middle 80% are happy to be led by those that really care.

> not exactly life ruining and really shouldn't even be day-ruining.

These were people who lined up for hours outside of a bookstore still waiting to get in after midnight. Many of those people were young and the lack of perspective and experience at young ages often results in assigning a disproportionate weight to the emotional events they experience. An event like that might not have been day-ruining for you, but I have no doubt that there were people who were genuinely hurt by it.


I'd rather remind people that only a very small number of dicks have any desire or interest in inflicting pain on their fellow humans even when there were no consequences.

Assholes do exist, and you should be aware of them, but assholes are a tiny minority of the population. There are far more people who aren't assholes, and an even greater number of people who are just doing their own thing and can't be bothered to go through the effort to hurt others just for kicks.


A takedown from the entity hosting the content is one thing, but forcing them to give up someone's ID is another.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: