Where is Rust unstable?

The Greens are not part of the current government.

What are you talking about?

Brain fart. I mean CDU. I guess they behave like Greens so much I got them confused. Also, not "sacked" but not renewed, but it's kind of the same thing in practice.

https://x.com/olk_julian/status/2025937252086382918

You can't edit the registry without admin rights which you don't have on a work laptop.

Yeah that's a fair point.

I would write it Hackernews-Leser for better readability but both goes.

It would be wrong, though.

The Duden is not official since 1996.

Since 2004 the official guidelines for the german speaking countries (Germany, Austria, Swiss, Belgium, South Tirol, Liechtenstein, Romania, Hungary - see this founding document with the list: https://www.rechtschreibrat.com/DOX/wiener_erklaerung.pdf) are covered by the Rechtschreibrat (https://www.rechtschreibrat.com/).

The official german dictionary is here: https://grammis.ids-mannheim.de/rechtschreibung/6774

I wrote "predominant", not "official". And I think that is still true.

Also, from what I can tell using the site, it does not serve as a full dictionary. Rather, it lists the general rules of German orthography (as decided by the Rechtschreibrat) and has some limited tables of special words.

Warcraft 3 custom map mod was the birth of Defense of the Ancients Allstars which then became its own game by Valve as Dota 2 (and Blizzard was pissed and tried legal stuff to reclaim) which now became Deadlock = Dota 3.

It's been a while ...

APL

The message, at least for me, does not convey that merely opening may lead to code execution.

Other IDEs do this too btw

"I purchased"

sudo run "some link to a shell script"

Never understood why that became so common place ...

It's not really different than downloading a .msi or .exe installer on Windows and running it. Or downloading a .pkg installer on macOS and running it (or running a program supplied in a .dmg). Or downloading a .deb or .rpm on Linux and running it.

It's all whether or not you trust the entity supplying the installer, be it your package manager or a third party.

At least with shell scripts, you have the opportunity to read it first if you want to.

It is different: you give it sudo immediately so it doesn't have to ask.

Of course, many installers ask for administrator access anyway...

I don't think it's functionally different if you write sudo on the command line or if the installer uses sudo in the script.

As you said, most installers need to place binaries in privileged locations anyway.

Stick the script in a. deb & tell 'em to use dpkg, much less suspicious.

Because everyone uses airgapped disposable micro VM's for everything, right? No one would be stupid or lazy enough to run them on their development laptop or production server, right? Right!?!

Maybe the good side-effect of LLM's will be to standardize better hygiene and put a nail in the coffin of using full-fat kitchen sink OS images for everything.

No, of course every reasonable developer works with a bag full of disposable e-vapes, each one used to run a single command on and then thrown into a portable furnace.

But people check shell scripts before running them... right?

As well as .debs and other

I don't... I just tell myself that if anything bad happens I can always just format the computer and start anew.