Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | NotHowStatsWork's commentslogin

It becomes even more obvious when you look at the rest of the chart.

While the income breakdown is 22%/23%/32%, the urban breakdown is 30%/25%/28%/12%. With the largest difference between City and Rural.

This is not commented on by the author, as it would undercut their implicit point.


"So, 70% fake/flawed."

I think you miss read that section? Only were 44% fake or flawed acording to this study.

The 26% that were very flawed is a subset of the 44% that were flawed in general. So those precentages should not be added together.


Oh the irony!


Are you saying the comment's analysis was ... flawed?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: