Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | GarnetFloride's commentslogin

I like physical copies as they can't be remotely deleted, altered, or slapped full of ads.

I do enjoy a very limited number of hardcovers from my most favorite stories from my favorite authors. Great for curling up in bed with.

Paperback is fine, even in the trade paperback sizes now. Though some authors like Brandon Sanderson don't make novels but bookzillas, and I've thought more than once of getting used copies to split for easier carrying.


Isn't it like that old story about catching monkeys. You hollow out a gourd with a small hole, tack it to the ground and put a nut in it. The monkey can get its hand in but not out with the nut in their fist. The human can walk over and leisurely whack the monkey because the monkey can't let go.

They act just like drug addicts. More's the pity. They can change but they don't seem to understand that rock bottom is a tough place to be.


The Monkey trap is a very powerful analogy.

It is looking like we are venturing into harder times these new few years for various reasons, as such one has to wonder what things you are still clinging to that can be let go and what is still worth handing on to. Hopefully we don't have to make those choices but it is always handy to keep in mind.


Baking eggless applesauce oatmeal cookies and chocolate chip cookies.

We saw it over the weekend and had a blast. There were a lot of easter eggs and cameos that we saw but we know we missed a fair number of them. Not enough to see it in theaters again but at home with freeze frame.

You could tell the people who made this movie really loved doing it. That's the real thing about it.

Its also commentary on corporate media, that the execs tried to kill it only tells on them.


> You could tell the people who made this movie really loved doing it. That's the real thing about it.

Who wouldn't? I'd PAY to help with it.


are you kidding me? It's right in the preamble "promote the general welfare" if clean water does not count, then neither should all the other BS they've argued into existence over that phrase should either.

Sometimes you need to think outside the box, sometimes inside the box, and sometimes you need to think about the box itself.

Some people will tear down Chesterton's fence because they don't want to feel limited, others won't approach because they want to be safe. Few ask why it was put up in the first place.

With nothing but a piece of paper and a pencil you can draw an alley or start building an imaginary world.

Too many of us turn boundaries into chains to hold us down.


"If they would rather die," said Scrooge, "they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population." -A Christmas Carol (1843)

The whole point of civilization is to help people.

If a business cannot support civilization, then why should it continue to exist?


> If a business cannot support civilization, then why should it continue to exist?

Sorry, how does this relate to my comment?


Civilization occurs when one person helps another who cannot help themselves. That's a simple definition, but it should suffice for this discussion.

Your original comment was what to do about those people whose labour does not equal or exceed the minimum wage value.

In everything I have read and all the people I have talked to about this, after sufficient questioning, the answer always seems to end up being murdering the poor. Oh, it's never going out and killing them personally. Oh no, that would be terrible, it's always destroy support systems and flooding the market with cheap but eventually deadly substances of varying sorts, so it's always at second hand.

Yet on the other hand I have seen so many companies damaged and even destroyed by someone whose economic value is extremely negative, but somehow spins it as a good thing and so walks away with big paychecks and fat bonuses and go on to another company to do it again.

I saw a PM so thoroughly mess up that they made it impossible for the company to provide software licenses to their customers. Managements response was not to fix the broken spreadsheet, oh no, that would be the smart thing to do. No, it was to lay people off because revenue was down. It was like selling cars but never giving the customer the keys to drive off. Who would actually finish the transaction?

But hey, he's are an executive, so it's fine when he destroys tens or hundreds of millions of dollars worth of customer revenue. Now, that teenage girl trying to feed, house and transport herself, now she deserves to have her every action, interaction and off-duty thought scrutinized at the nano level because how dare she want to live a life worth living when her parents aren't already rich?

I remember when a fast-food place was staffed with a dozen people and the food was good and was actually delivered quickly. Now it's just a couple and it takes forever to get through the drive-thru to get food that poisons you. At least corporate is posting record profits again.

It's not that the girl at the drive-thru isn't generating huge profits, she and all of them very much are. It's that someone else has decided that she doesn't deserve to participate in the rewards of those profits.

I always get the feel that they are so disappointed that slavery is mostly illegal. So many systems have been put in place to suck all the money off the table so it becomes more and more expensive to survive, minimum wage was an attempt to protect people, that is what a functional civilization does.

So back to civilization, people come together to share resources, so people can support each other. Some people think they are special. They treat people as things and that is the problem. When people are things, they become disposable, and that is wrong.


> The whole point of civilization is to help people

Sorry, what? I mean, helping people is nice, but that's a very sweeping hippie sort of claim. I suppose you could say trade helps people, but that is a side effect of trade, not necessarily the point. Also, minimum wages often 'hurt' the very people they were designed to help.


Picked up by Apple, of all places, and Brandon finished the first draft of the screenplay last week.


I use Mortimer's system for non-fiction works, which is where it makes the most sense.

I would also use it if I was doing a really deep dive in a fiction work.

For most fiction that I am reading for entertainment, the first 50ish pages will tell me if its worth finishing.


Now we just need something to replace paper for a whole new rock-paper-scissors paradigm.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: