Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | FatherOfCurses's commentslogin

For me the gold standard take on "selling out" is "Hooker with a Penis" by Tool.

Why keep the goose that lays the golden eggs alive when you can kill it and get all the golden eggs today?

Arch + Wayland finally got me dailying Linux for non-business use instead of Windows or Mac about a year ago. I admittedly have riced out things a bit but it is the most pleasant computing experience I currently have access to.

The only pain I've encountered is not being able to get RustDesk going, but that's not been a show-stopper for me.


"Enterprise Java"

Factories! Factories everywhere!


Why do you think this plays out over and over again? What's the causal mechanisms of this strange attractor

Yes! Obligatory link to the seminal work on the subject:

https://gwern.net/doc/cs/2005-09-30-smith-whyihateframeworks...


We need a cheap fast way to turn vacant or underutilized commercial property into carbon sinks.

Like some way to fill up an empty parking lot at an empty office park or strip mall with portable self-watering containers that contain something like grass or bamboo or de-THC hemp.

No need to re-zone anything, just roll up with it while the land is not being used, soak up some carbon, and then move on if the land gets used again.


Sounds solarpunk, I’m in.

In an economy that depends on consumer spending, you can only wipe out so many jobs until no one can afford to purchase consumer goods.

Did you do the security setup for Jurassic Park?

So is prioritizing corporate profiteering.

Disagree

There are also laws about how fast you can drive to your restaurant and whether you can assault your employees once you get there. Neither of them have a place in a conversation about the efficacy of food safety laws, nor do the building permits you mention. We have different laws to regulate different domains and they exist largely because someone cut corners in the past and people literally died.

> Neither of them have a place in a conversation about the efficacy of food safety laws

They do because these fees are paid to engineers and architects as well as to the local health authority to certify that the restaurant is up to local "health codes", keeping in mind this is pre-lease and pre-construction. They regulate the size of pipes, the potential ventilation, amount of washrooms, amount of sinks, etc... in the name of food safety.

Now that's fine but why do governments get tens of thousands of those fees? There's also no nuance for small-scale operators. And if you buy a defunct restaurant that's already paid those fees, you get to pay them again. Again, these are to comply with "health regulations" and are things that no non-food business needs to pay.


Man, all I ever did with Hypercard was make custom inserts for my cassette tape cases.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: